Tachoblog Asks Will There Be More LCVs In America?
Thanks to CR England Girl, Tachoblog has been alerted to the fact that the The American Trucking Association is currently pushing to increase the number of longer-combination vehicles (LCVs) allowed on US highways as part of its initiative to green the industry.
However, there are those, including some truck drivers, that are convinced that LCVs could cause more harm than good.
The arguements seem to parallel those in Europe regarding the same type of vehicles, only over here / there they are called Longer Heavier Vehicles or LHVs. Whilst some countries such as Holland permit LHVs (LZVs as they call them!) such as the one below, the United Kingdom doesn’t and for pretty much the same reasons as their detractors in the USA.
In America only 23 states in the country allow LCVs on their roads, typically those with less densely-populated areas (California has banned them altogether). Many claim triple and even double trailers are dangerous and comprise safety, especially in areas where there are more drivers on the road.
But the ATA argues that LCVs have a decent safety record – better than five-axle semis. In fact, they are the most regulated vehicles on the road; drivers of such vehicles must have special permits to operate them, they are only allowed on certain roads, and they must get off the road during inclement weather.
Furthermore, truck driving companies don’t take any risks when it comes to operating LCVs – they use only their best and most experienced drivers.
The ATA claims that having more LCVs on the road will increase fuel efficiency, shrink truck congestion, and reduce pollution since it will result in fewer trucks on the road.




Too bad the ATA is nothing more than the big carriers trying to cut costs. They have nothing to do with drivers. LCV’s are being tested in Ontario Canada using dual 53′ trailers. What that means for the carrier is one truck and one driver hauling the freight that normally would take two trucks and two drivers.
Sure, there is a decrease in GHG’s but it comes at the expense of jobs. It is a big win for the big carriers and a big loss for drivers in lost jobs.
In Ontario, LCV’s will be restricted to 90km/h (55mp/h) causing even more safety issues with such a significant speed differential between four-wheelers and LCV’s (It is bad enough that Ontario implemented mandatory speed limiters on all large trucks. They are limited to 100km/h (65mp/h)) Again, large carries lobbied for this unsafe law in the form of the OTA (Ontario Trucking Association.) They used the guise of it being better for the environment, completely disregarding numerous studies that prove split speed limits increase accidents. A very bad idea. Large carriers who already have speed limiters on their trucks, used this law to stifle the many smaller carriers who could travel at higher speeds to limit and remove competition.
Back to LCV’s. With them limited to an even slower speed, drivers are faced now with three varied speeds along highway 401 which is the busiest stretch of highway in North America running 825km (445mi) from Windsor, ON to the Quebec line. Through the Greater Toronto Area, there will be lines of LCV’s in the right lane, standard length trucks trying to pass them in the middle lane, and four-wheelers racing at 120-140km/h (70-90mp/h) despite the speed limit being 100km/h (63mp/h.)
Merging and exiting the highway will be where the most serious of accident conditions will occur.
All in all a very unsafe idea. Chalk this up to being a very unsafe and unfair pair of ideas all thanks to large companies and their associations.
Correction: Speed Limiters are set to 105km/h not 100km/h as stated.
da best. Keep it going! Thank you
Update: The OTA estimates that 2,800 trucks *per day* will be removed from the Greater Toronto Area of the 401. That is 2,800 people not driving those trucks. The companies using LCV’s will save money at the expense of jobs and safety. The sad part is they are calling it “Enviromentally Friendly” as an excuse to get it passed. However, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the real reason is money.
I really liked this post. Can I copy it to my site? Thank you in advance.
Hi,
So long as you credit us as the source with a link back to the item here then you are welcome to.
Regards,
Tachoblog.
What site is that? Would like to look at it.